Status status

In response to some pointed emails regarding the non-validity of pre-nuptials in Singapore, let me just say one thing: jurisdiction. For example, many wise men such as Mick Jagger, chose to get married on the so-called romantic island of "Bali". In addition to the pre-nup, the entire marriage ceremony conducted there can be declared null and void by other jurisdictions, leaving you scot free, forget that alimony.

I have often contemplated such a course of action myself, but as we all know the Balinese are out to fleece anyone who steps on their island, and the going rate for a wedding ceremony, I believe, is the first-born. There, now I have done my bit for the community this week, sharing this priceless  and completely true piece of information.

Next, some of you ask why do I care about (relationship) "status" or even its perception. It is a matter of principle. Wake up, people! Status is important and I am very displeased at the sort of discrimination shown by important parts of the law-and-disorder community, such as Facebook.

Exhibit 1: On Facebook, there are statuses such as "Single", "Married" etc. I demand that there be a status called "Multiple". I do not believe I have to explain this, but hey! some of us choose alternative lifestyles. And no, "Its complicated" is not the same as "Multiple", in fact "It's not at all complicated" would be my ideal status / pickup line. In fact, there should be a status combining "Multiple", "Its NOT complicated" and "Simultaneously" all into one.

Unfortunately, Facebook rejected my suggestion in general and the specific term I suggested in particular.